顯示具有 law 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 law 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2009年6月4日 星期四

採購財務處理準則 (參考用)

報價 Quotation
採購額>$3000 就應向多於一間公司報價
留意利益衝突, 需申報利益關係
留意報價單有期限(通常一個月)
有時採購最後決定權不在自身, 需交出報價單(並只能作出建議)予上司決定

單據處理--可接受之單據
不可混有私人購買的物資
避免使用信用咭,積分咭,八達通付款及累積積分
60日之內之單據
不可有塗污(i.e. 不可在單據作筆記)
不可有修改(除非有公司蓋印證明)
不可用兩種不同顏色的筆書寫
不可是白頭單
不可是影印本
單據抬頭不能為個人, 要是其代表之組織
若單據上文字容易褪色,請將有關單據即時影印

單據需有以後以下資料:
  • 公司名稱, 電話, 地址(有需要時,可以公司蓋印代替, 但不建議用於大額交易)
  • (最好有公司蓋印)
  • 購買日期(年,月,日)
  • 購買物品(名稱,數量,單價)(不能概括描述物品)
  • 購買總額
  • cash memo, receipt, 正單, 現沽單等(不能為invoice, 發票或發貨單)
ref:
救世軍之迎新營財務及尋求贊助須知 講座, organized by OSA, CUHK

others:
單據處理樣式

2008年12月13日 星期六

陪審團制度

究竟陪審團制度公平嗎? (Life is for sharing, isn't it?)
1. 缺乏真正代表社區的代表
2. 陪審團不能完全理解律師的問題
3. 陪審團對一些複雜的審訊很難理解
4. 陪審團對自己的工作不理解
5. 另外陪審團是十分time consuming同costly的


十二怒漢 - 維基百科,自由的百科全書

2007年4月27日 星期五

Criminal law

The actus reus — sometimes called the external elements of a crime — is the Latin term for the "guilty act" which, when proved beyond a reasonable doubt in combination with the mens rea, i.e., the "guilty mind", produces criminal liability in common law-based criminal law jurisdictions Canada, New Zealand, England, Scotland and the United States. In the United States, some crimes also require proof of an attendant circumstance.

The mens rea is the Latin term for "guilty mind" used in the criminal law. The standard common law test of criminal liability is usually expressed in the Latin phrase, actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, which means that "the act does not make a person guilty unless the mind is also guilty". Thus, in jurisdictions with due process, there must be an actus reus accompanied by some level of mens rea to constitute the crime with which the defendant is charged (see the technical requirement of concurrence). The exception is strict liability crimes (in the civil law, it is not usually necessary to prove a subjective mental element to establish liability, say for breach of contract or a tort, although if intentionally committed, this may increase the measure of damages payable to compensate the plaintiff).